NYPD Eugene Schatz ARRESTED in 2019 loses Teflon Status he Afforded others?

http://misogynistnyc.blogspot.com/2017/08/nypd-detective-andrew-dwyer-lt-burgos.html?m=1

Highlight 2019 NYPD Eugene Schatz Arrested but not for party to goal violently coerce me, at least he was arrested for a crime so many years of enjoying Teflon status he afforded others? NYPD Eugene Schatz A Corrupt Cop Loses Teflon Status he afforded others? Ed Winski party to goal coerce me erase crimes for rich MD's office SoHo Dr Andrew Fagelman who has lots of NYPD patients, Ed gave Preferential policing to a playmate who ended up murdering her small child and killing herself I sure would like to know if that creepy unethical medical doctor Dr Andrew Fagelman has any kind of relationship with NYPD Gene Schatz, NYPD Det. Tommy Moran, Ed Winski etc how about any retired NYPD on any billionaires payroll starting with Bill Rudin? Also I'd like to ask all these NYPD from the 1st Precinct about a playmate that ended up murdering her small child and herself but was cater to by the NYPD most especially Ed Winski. N.Y.P.D. Leaves Offenses Unrecorded to Keep Crime Rates Down - The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/31/nyregion/nypd-leaves-offenses-unrecorded-to-keep-crime-rates-down.html suzannahtroy (@suzannahtroy) 12/31/19, 10:03 AM NYPD PO Eugene Schatz a corrupt cop 01 precinct that caters to the rich finally gets arrested but it's for drunk driving. He was party to the goal violently coerce me erase all crimes! NYPD committed crimes to erase crimes! #discrimination #civilrightsnydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-c… Download the Twitter app 12/30/19, 9:32 AM ⁦‪@suzannahtroy‬⁩ ⁦‪@VanityFair‬⁩ ⁦‪@FBI‬⁩ ⁦‪@NewYorkFBI‬⁩⁦‪@Google‬⁩ ⁦‪@jkbjournalist‬⁩ ⁦‪@YouTube‬⁩ ⁦‪@nytimes‬⁩⁦‪@washingtonpost‬⁩ ⁦‪@NYPDChiefofDept‬⁩⁦‪@NYPDFIRSTDEP‬⁩ ⁦‪@NYPDDetectives‬⁩⁦‪@NYPDChiefPatrol‬⁩ ⁦‪@JusticeOIG‬⁩ ⁦‪@NYCMayor‬⁩⁦‪@MountSinaiNYC‬⁩ ⁦‪@MikeBloomberg‬⁩ ⁦‪@NYPDShea‬⁩⁦‪@GayleKing‬⁩ ⁦‪@NYGovCuomo‬⁩suzannahbtroy.blogspot.com/2019/12/da-nyt…NYPD Ed Winski playmate she went on to murder her child suicide. google.com/amp/s/nypost.c…he discriminated against me+favor for MD didn't fire Delita Hooks, gang NYPD 01 broke laws Det Dwyer promoted to NYPD FBI task force. TF raided Epstein island 0arrests pic.twitter.com/b7qj6EZOXT A highlight 2019 is NYPD PO Eugene Schatz a corrupt cop 01 precinct that caters to the rich finally gets arrested but it's for drunk driving. He was party to the goal violently coerce me erase all crimes! NYPD committed crimes to erase crimes! #discrimination #civilrights

https://nypdnewcommission.blogspot.com/2019/10/nypd-po-gene-schatz-his-fb-nypd-det.html?m=1

I'm just wondering if these evil corrupt cops who discriminated against me and thought violence towards me at a doctors office where people are the most vulnerable is funny some of them may even go to the same doctors office and the violence  would be not be OK if it was them or a family member but because they discriminated against me and continue to do so along with your bosses violence towards me is OK!


Downgrading crimes by falsifying police reports are crimes with no statute of limitations as is the goal to erase all crimes by BREAKING LAWS!  Look who benefited! Look at the promotions well I continue to fight for justice I continue to wait for a mayor, a police commissioner a corporate counsel had an a comptroller with integrity however many years or decades it takes.


I'm just wondering if these evil corrupt cops who discriminated against me and thought violence towards me at a doctors office where people are the most vulnerable is funny some of them may even go to the same doctors office and the violence  would be not be OK if it was them or a family member but because they discriminated against me and continue to do so along with your bosses violence towards me is OK!
https://nypdstatcreativestatfixing.blogspot.com/?m=1

http://misogynistnyc.blogspot.com/2017/08/nypd-detective-andrew-dwyer-lt-burgos.html?m=1






http://corruptnewyawk-citystate.blogspot.com/2017/08/nypd-detective-andrew-dwyer-broke-laws.html

Wayne Barrett Mike Bloomberg broke campaign laws the Village voice article I recommend you copy it in case it's

https://www.villagevoice.com/2010/02/22/mike-bloomberg-broke-election-law-admit-his-own-lawyers/

NEWS & POLITICS

Mike Bloomberg Broke Election Law, Admit His Own Lawyers

by WAYNE BARRETT

FEBRUARY 22, 2010

Things are looking slushy, Mike

Even Mike Bloomberg’s lawyers say he broke election law when he gave $1.2 million to the Independence Party right before the November election.

The mayor’s media guru, Howard Wolfson, and his elections lawyer Ken Gross told the Daily News that Bloomberg’s two $600,000 personal checks to the party were used for poll-watchers, drivers, cellphones and food for election day. In their eagerness to account for the missing money — most of which went to a mysterious, unincorporated firm now under investigation by Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance — the two unwittingly admitted to an apparent violation of city and state campaign finance laws.

That’s at least what a brief filed by Gross himself in September 2009 seems to indicate. Gross, a Washington-based, former counsel to the Federal Elections Commission whose firm, Skadden Arps, was paid $282,175 by Bloomberg’s campaign, responded to a complaint submitted to the city’s Campaign Finance Board by making arguments that may come back to haunt his client.

Democratic candidate William Thompson alleged in the August 20 complaint that an earlier series of $1.6 million in Bloomberg personal contributions to the Independence Party, as well as another $1.7 million in personal donations to Republican and other political committees, was an end run around the city’s campaign finance system, and should have been funneled through his campaign committee.

Many of the contributions were made right around the time that these party organizations endorsed Bloomberg for re-election and appeared to be connected to the endorsements.

Gross argued in a 14-page response to Thompson that Bloomberg’s “campaign committee is only required to report as expenditures those contributions it made to other committees for the purpose of furthering his re-election campaign.” That was a good argument then — since Gross was contending that the committees that got Bloomberg’s personal largesse didn’t spend the money to benefit his campaign. Not so good now, however, when Gross concedes that Bloomberg’s donation to the Independence Party was used precisely for that purpose.

The lawyer also argued that most of Mike’s $3.3 million was given to party housekeeping accounts and cited the state laws that specify that such accounts cover the day-to-day expenses of running a party and are not supposed to be used to pay campaign expenses. According to Gross, the millions given to these accounts by Bloomberg “could not be used to support any candidate.”

“By definition,” went Gross’s ringing conclusion, “if the Housekeeping funds could not be used for candidate support, Mayor Bloomberg’s contributions to these accounts could not have been for the support of his candidacy.” Of course, he’s saying now that the $1.2 million was given to a housekeeping account specifically to support Bloomberg’s candidacy. Gross did not reply to very specific messages left for him by the Voice.

Eric Friedman, the spokesman for the Campaign Finance Board, would not comment on the question of whether the Bloomberg campaign has essentially admitted to a violation of its statutes. He did note that the CFB “audits each and every campaign” to make sure they are “complete and accurate,” certainly indicating that it would be auditing this one. It’s unclear if the board, a majority of whose members are appointed by Bloomberg, will refer any if its preliminary findings to Vance’s office, which is actively assessing the party donations.

Laurence Laufer, the attorney who filed the complaint for Thompson, says that there is a third legal issue, beyond the CFB and the housekeeping issues. Laufer says that even if Bloomberg chose to make the contributions personally, he still had to report them as a candidate to the city and state Board of Elections. Laufer says there’s “a reporting obligation on the mayor’s part” under section 14104 of the state election law even if, by some quirk, he was not required to report the donations to the finance board.

“If the expenditures were to aid the campaign,” said Laufer, Bloomberg “had to report them either one way or the other,” as a committee expenditure or the personal expenditure of a candidate. The section cited by Laufer makes it a Class A misdemeanor for “any candidate” not to file a sworn statement “as to all moneys paid, given or expended to aid his own nomination or election,” and specifically includes “contributions to political committees.”

It’s unclear if the apparent CFB breaches might also be misdemeanors (filing a false statement), but the housekeeping account submissions do appear to be penal violations. If Bloomberg had given his donations to the party’s campaign committee — which is allowed to spend its money on pollwatchers and drivers and cellphones — he would only have been allowed to give approximately $94,000. His decision to give it to the housekeeping account skirted that limitation, and both giving and accepting contributions beyond those limits is a crime.

Of course, the question is why did Bloomberg make these two payments — on October 30 and November 2 — in this potentially illegal way? Had he given the contributions through his campaign committee, they would have been disclosed immediately on the CFB’s website. He would also have had to provide detailed backup about the purpose of the expenditure. By making the contributions personally, he construed the law to mean he didn’t have to report them at all — a highly dubious position.

The only way the public ever learned about the donations was when the Independence Party reported receiving them in mid-January, two and a half months later. State disclosure requirements are so minimal that reporters had to unearth how the funds were spent. The media is now focused on the $750,000 of Bloomberg’s money that wound up delivered to a company run by a Bloomberg operative named John Haggerty Jr., but as intriguing as that storyline is, the far more salient issue is what laws the mayor may have violated himself.

Ironically, the violation may well be a continuing one. Gross’s firm is obviously still representing Bloomberg on this matter, answering Post and News questions and ducking mine. Who do you think is paying him? Mike or his defunct committee?

Please excuse terrible typos I endured a savagely violent assault Google Dr Fagelman assault all involved are Teflon like Jeffrey Epstein was and Ghislaine Maxwell is protected by corrupt NYPD and DA